Haters-Gonna-Hate-Me on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/haters-gonna-hate-me/art/Critiques-Again-261919953Haters-Gonna-Hate-Me

Deviation Actions

Haters-Gonna-Hate-Me's avatar

Critiques Again

Published:
5.1K Views

Description

If it's completely nice, it's an asspat and, therefore, not an actual critique.

Opened critiques for the lulz... again. :XD:

(I was going to make it flash, but... :C)
Image size
99x56px 7.06 KB
© 2011 - 2024 Haters-Gonna-Hate-Me
Comments88
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
:star::star::star::star::star-half: Overall
:star::star::star::star::star-half: Vision
:star::star::star::star::star-half: Originality
:star::star::star::star::star-empty: Technique
:star::star::star::star::star: Impact

A Critique is a detailed analyzing of the art at hand, of which what people think the art is good at most and somethings that you could make better. Considering this is my first critique. Surprise surprise, I'm doing one. So let's get started shall we?

First of all, yes "nice" critiques are completely unnecessary as they don't point out what the artist who made the art you are critiquing could have done to make it better. Which makes the critique completely pointless.

Originality is in check as I have not seen anyone do a stamp or any art on the problem of people giving artists ass-kissings through Critiquing, and no-one actually does so to deal with the problem until now.

Technique: A stamp is something people can put on any type of text besides Critiques, so people who do put the stamp in their collection help get the word out faster (see Canaan's Critique) but people may not understand what you mean by "nice" critiques. Could it be constructive? I'll cut some slack since stamps can only be so large and that trying to say what you mean by nice is hard to explain.

So I'm going to say I give this artwork, a 4.5/5